Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 9:44:40 GMT
The Development of Representative Democracy During This Period Did Not Take Place Against the Backdrop of Calls for a Crisis of Representation, Although This Has Been Pointed Out in Various Languages. What We Long for is Something That Never Existed. Our Lamentations Are Melancholy in Nature. On the Other Hand if One Had to Choose Another Common Thread to Express Unease About the Faced by Our Democracies Then It Undoubtedly Has to Do With Reactions to the Emergence and Development of Internet Algorithms and Networks. Society Comes With All the Pathologies and Disasters It Seems to Bring: Fake News, Polarized Identity, Discourse, Proliferation, Narcissism, Etc. According to This Vision the Post-internet Public Sphere is Often Simply and Coldly Referred to as the Cyberme.
Mass Public Dialogue, as One Prefers to Call It, Appears to Be One of the Major Threats at the Moment. The Crisis of Representation and the Decline of the Public Sphere Since the Advent of the Internet Are Two Inevitable Factors That Point to the Weaknesses UK Mobile Database of Our Democracies. Lamenting the Crisis of Representation Simultaneously Smacks of Technocracy and Voluntarism, as if Representation is a Broken Machine That Can Somehow Be Fixed. The Underlying Suggestion is That if Politicians Come Closer or Are More Closely Connected to the Daily Lives of Citizens Another Rooster Will Crow. But in This Way of Understanding the Crisis Represented, Whoever is Trying to Solve It is Actually Asking for More.
More Personalist Politics Uses the Language of the Century or More Populism Uses the Language of the Century. In Any Case We Seem to Be Facing a Problem of a Degree Facing a Setback That Can Be Solved by Changing the Behavior of Politicians and Bursting Their Bubbles. On the Other Hand, More Vicious Laments About the Deterioration of Democracy in Mass Public Dialogue Seem to Tap Into the Deeper Fibers of Polarization, the Spread of Fake News, or the Transformation of Politics Into Identity Battles. People Spend More Time Showing Off Than Actually Participating in Changing the World or Improving Collective Life. The Fear Raised by Mass Public Dialogue is Often the Paradoxical Concern That the Digital Masses Are Susceptible to Algorithms.
Mass Public Dialogue, as One Prefers to Call It, Appears to Be One of the Major Threats at the Moment. The Crisis of Representation and the Decline of the Public Sphere Since the Advent of the Internet Are Two Inevitable Factors That Point to the Weaknesses UK Mobile Database of Our Democracies. Lamenting the Crisis of Representation Simultaneously Smacks of Technocracy and Voluntarism, as if Representation is a Broken Machine That Can Somehow Be Fixed. The Underlying Suggestion is That if Politicians Come Closer or Are More Closely Connected to the Daily Lives of Citizens Another Rooster Will Crow. But in This Way of Understanding the Crisis Represented, Whoever is Trying to Solve It is Actually Asking for More.
More Personalist Politics Uses the Language of the Century or More Populism Uses the Language of the Century. In Any Case We Seem to Be Facing a Problem of a Degree Facing a Setback That Can Be Solved by Changing the Behavior of Politicians and Bursting Their Bubbles. On the Other Hand, More Vicious Laments About the Deterioration of Democracy in Mass Public Dialogue Seem to Tap Into the Deeper Fibers of Polarization, the Spread of Fake News, or the Transformation of Politics Into Identity Battles. People Spend More Time Showing Off Than Actually Participating in Changing the World or Improving Collective Life. The Fear Raised by Mass Public Dialogue is Often the Paradoxical Concern That the Digital Masses Are Susceptible to Algorithms.